Service

Security Review for high-visibility releases

Manual security testing + vulnerability discovery focused on real deployment risk backed by reproducible evidence.

Promise
  • Manual security testing aligned to deployment-critical risk
  • Tool assisted assessments (Nmap, Nikto) + structured test cases
  • Clear findings + remediation guidance for engineering teams

What you get

Security findings report

Validated issues with severity, impact, and reproduction steps.

Security test cases

Concrete test cases you can reuse for future releases and regressions.

Retest checklist

A practical checklist to confirm fixes before shipping.

How it works

  • Identify critical flows for release (auth, roles/permissions, sensitive actions)
  • Map entry points and exposed services/endpoints
  • Baseline scan to detect obvious exposure (e.g., open ports/services)

Evidence you will actually see

Reproduction steps (clear and repeatable)
Tool outputs when relevant (Nmap/Nikto summaries)
Security test case set (what to test next time)
Retest confirmation notes (fixed / still failing)

Principle: Evidence over opinions — every claim is backed by a reproducible result.

Tools & stack

Nmap (Discovery & exposure)

Port/service discovery, network footprint, verification of unintended exposure.

Nikto (Web server baseline checks)

Quick detection of common server misconfigurations and risky defaults.

Burp Suite / OWASP ZAP (Manual validation)

Intercept traffic, reproduce issues, validate exploitability (reduce scanner noise).

Code scanning (SAST + dependencies)

Identify risky patterns and vulnerable libraries early in PRs.

Threat modeling (STRIDE-lite)

Map entry points, trust boundaries, and “what matters” before testing deeper.

Tracking & evidence (Jira + reports)

Clear reproduction steps, severity, expected secure behavior, and retest notes.

FAQs

What’s included in a Security Review?+
Attack surface mapping + baseline scanning + manual security testing to validate real exploitability, with clear remediation guidance and fix verification.
Do you do penetration testing or just vulnerability scanning?+
Both. Scans help find signals fast; manual testing confirms what’s truly exploitable and removes false positives.
How do you decide what to test first?+
We prioritize deployment-critical flows: auth, roles/permissions, sensitive actions, integrations, and any data that creates legal or business risk.
Will this affect production or user data?+
We plan safe execution: test environments when possible, rate limits, non-destructive techniques, agreed scope, and clear stop conditions.
What evidence do we get from findings?+
Repro steps, impacted endpoints/flows, severity, proof-of-concept (safe), and expected secure behavior—plus retest results after fixes.
Can you work with React frontends and .NET / API backends?+
Yes. We test end-to-end flows and API surfaces, and we communicate findings in a way engineers can act on quickly.
Do you cover OWASP Top 10 and common web risks?+
Yes—auth/session issues, access control, injection, misconfigurations, sensitive data exposure, and insecure integrations are core focus areas.
Can you integrate security checks into CI/CD?+
We can recommend lightweight gates (SAST/dependency scans) and a cadence for deeper manual reviews before high-visibility releases.
Back to Home